# Desk log ADR-VDA-20260825

**Status:** First-party InfiniSynapse desk log (sanitized composite; not a customer extract)
**Page:** https://infinisynapse.com/en/blog/verifiable-data-assets
**Run ID:** `ADR-VDA-20260825`
**Date:** 2026-08-25 (Tuesday)
**Last verified:** 2026-08-29
**Operator:** InfiniSynapse Data Team
**Attestor:** William Zhu, InfiniSynapse cofounder ([GitHub @allwefantasy](https://github.com/allwefantasy); no personal LinkedIn)
**Contact for contradictions:** zhuhl@infinisynapse.com

## What this file is

A downloadable record of a weekly contribution pack whose chart used a friendly contribution that included test accounts, while the CSV used the bound definition that excluded them—then a re-run that forced one definition, one SQL, and one chart. It is **not** a named-logo customer case, a vendor bake-off, or an Impala / StarRocks / Stanford / McKinsey experiment.

Companion files: [aggregate CSV](https://infinisynapse.com/blog-media/verifiable-data-assets/downloads/aggregate-ADR-VDA-20260825.csv) · [verify script](https://infinisynapse.com/blog-media/verifiable-data-assets/downloads/verify-ADR-VDA-20260825.py).

## Four-step method (reproducible)

1. Bind a weekly contribution goal on a read-only finance-adjacent source plus a one-page definition note locking “contribution” and “test account.” Sanitize first.
2. Request a Markdown memo, a PDF copy, two charts, and a CSV of SKUs over 8% versus plan.
3. Score three checks on the looks-complete folder: chart matches SQL, one predicate, CSV opens to SQL.
4. Re-run with “one definition, one SQL, one chart.” Score the same three checks.

## Source and goal

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Sources | One weekly fact table, about 15,600 order lines, plus a one-page definition note locking “contribution” and “test account” |
| Standing goal | Weekly contribution versus plan, SKU grain, test accounts excluded, memo plus CSV plus SQL |
| Contrast | Looks-complete pack vs pack that opens to the stored SQL |

## Results

| Retrieval state | Chart matches SQL | One predicate | CSV opens to SQL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Looks-complete pack | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Opens to stored SQL | 1 | 1 | 1 |

Wall-clock for the successful pack: 12 minutes (warehouse time excluded). The clock started when the operator opened the standing goal and ended when the chart, the CSV, and the SQL used one predicate.

## What you may cite

- Artifact counts 0/0/1 → 1/1/1, ~15,600 order lines on this run, ~12 min wall-clock, run ID

## What you may not claim

- Customer uplift %, official EEAT score, named-logo case, or that Impala / StarRocks / Elastic / OpenSearch / Stanford / McKinsey / Gartner / NIST / OWASP / WAIC / DataCite / W3C DCAT scored this run

## Independent context (not this run)

Retrieved 2026-08-29. None of these sources evaluated this page.

- [Apache Impala](https://impala.apache.org/)
- [StarRocks docs](https://starrocks.io/docs)
- [Elastic documentation index](https://www.elastic.co/guide/index.html)
- [OpenSearch latest docs](https://opensearch.org/docs/latest/)
- [Elasticsearch reference](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/index.html)
- [W3C DCAT](https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-3/)
- [DataCite](https://datacite.org/)
- [Stanford HAI AI Index](https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index)
- [McKinsey State of AI](https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai)
- [Gartner Peer Insights — Analytics and BI Platforms](https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/analytics-business-intelligence-platforms)
- [NIST AI Risk Management Framework](https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework)
- [OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications](https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications/)
- First-party homepage recognition only (self-described; not independently verified on this page): [2026 WAIC Future Tech OPC Excellence Award](https://infinisynapse.com/#recognition)