# Desk log KB-REPORT-JUNE-20260822

**Status:** First-party sanitized composite; not a customer extract, independent benchmark, third-party dataset, certification, media report, or endorsement
**Page:** https://infinisynapse.com/en/blog/upload-analysis-reports-as-context
**Run ID:** `KB-REPORT-JUNE-20260822`
**Date:** 2026-08-22
**Operator:** InfiniSynapse Data Team
**Attestor:** William Zhu, InfiniSynapse cofounder ([GitHub @allwefantasy](https://github.com/allwefantasy))
**Contact for contradictions:** zhuhl@infinisynapse.com

## What this file is

A downloadable record of the June-pack versus fresh-guess replay. It documents the six-step method, input boundary, 24.0 → 18.5 result, and artifact inventory. The companion [aggregate CSV](https://infinisynapse.com/blog-media/upload-analysis-reports-as-context/downloads/aggregate-KB-REPORT-JUNE-20260822.csv) contains only the published aggregate rows—not the 15,200-row extract. The companion [verify script](https://infinisynapse.com/blog-media/upload-analysis-reports-as-context/downloads/verify-KB-REPORT-JUNE-20260822.py) checks those published rows only. No independent reproduction was known as of 2026-08-28.

## Six-step method (reproducible)

1. Pick one source you are authorized to read. Prefer a replica or sanitized extract.
2. Choose one signed, dated report. Refuse the draft folder.
3. Upload the report, then bind it to that source. Binding is a separate click from upload.
4. Ask a new goal (this period’s rows, last period’s rule).
5. Inspect the artifacts and confirm the retrieved footnote plus the new count.
6. Ask a related goal next week. A successful replay keeps the same exclusion.

## Source and goal

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Source | Sanitized 15,200-row orders extract the desk is authorized to read |
| Source grain | One row per sanitized order |
| Source version | Fixed desk extract dated 2026-08-22 |
| Prior | June signed finance pack: marketplace fees excluded from contribution |
| Prior metadata | Sanitized composite; owner: InfiniSynapse Data Team; approval state: signed; content hash and original binary are not published |
| Bind mapping | June signed finance pack ↔ named orders extract |
| Retrieval configuration | Bound-pack retrieval; configuration values not published |
| No-prior baseline | Same goal and source with no signed prior bound |
| Goal asked twice | “What is July contribution?” |

## Results

| Retrieval state | Invoice−COGS margin | Fee-excluded contribution | July rerun uses June pack |
|---|---|---|---|
| No signed prior | 24.0 | 24.0 | 0 |
| June pack as context | 18.5 | 18.5 | 1 |

Nothing in the database changed between the two July runs. The bound prior changed which rule was allowed.

## Task artifacts

| Retrieval state | SQL | Memo | Chart | CSV | June footnote cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No signed prior | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | No |
| June pack as context | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | Yes |

Wall-clock for the bound rerun: 11 minutes (warehouse time excluded).

## Minimum disclosure for independent replication

Disclose source grain, row count, and version; signed-report hash, version, date, and owner; exclusion rule; bind mapping; retrieval configuration; query, SQL, and retrieved passage; the no-prior baseline; all outputs and failures; run time; and commercial conflicts of interest. Publish confirming and conflicting results.

## What you may cite

- Grain, 24.0 → 18.5, June-pack flag 0 → 1, artifact counts 1 / 1 / 2 / 1, June footnote cited No → Yes, run ID, ~11 min wall-clock

## What you may not claim

- Customer uplift, named-logo case, independent benchmark, certification, raw dataset, official EEAT score, or external validation

## External context (not validation of this run)

- [ISO 15489-1:2016 records management](https://www.iso.org/standard/62542.html) (retrieved 2026-08-28)
- [ISO 23081-1:2017 metadata for records](https://www.iso.org/standard/73172.html) (retrieved 2026-08-28)
- [W3C PROV-O Recommendation](https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/) (retrieved 2026-08-28)
- [NARA records management policy and guidance](https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/policy) (retrieved 2026-08-28)
- [NIST Privacy Framework](https://www.nist.gov/privacy-framework) (retrieved 2026-08-28)
- [NIST AI Risk Management Framework](https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework) (retrieved 2026-08-28)
- [UK NCSC secure AI system development guidelines](https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/guidelines-secure-ai-system-development) (retrieved 2026-08-28)
- [OWASP GenAI/LLM Top 10](https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications/) (retrieved 2026-08-28)

These sources define records, provenance, privacy, risk, or input-security practices. None evaluated, certified, reproduced, or endorsed this run.