# Desk log IDE-WEB-TRAIL-20260822

**Status:** First-party sanitized demo; not a customer case, benchmark, third-party evaluation, vendor test, certification, or media review
**Page:** https://infinisynapse.com/en/blog/ide-vs-web-data-analysis
**Run ID:** `IDE-WEB-TRAIL-20260822`
**Date:** 2026-08-22 (Saturday)
**Operator:** InfiniSynapse Data Team
**Attestor:** William Zhu, InfiniSynapse cofounder ([GitHub @allwefantasy](https://github.com/allwefantasy))
**Contact for contradictions:** zhuhl@infinisynapse.com

## What this file is

A downloadable record of an IDE “pack ready” sentence that hid a failed bind versus first-party task review. Companions: [aggregate CSV](https://infinisynapse.com/blog-media/ide-vs-web-data-analysis/downloads/aggregate-IDE-WEB-TRAIL-20260822.csv) and [verify script](https://infinisynapse.com/blog-media/ide-vs-web-data-analysis/downloads/verify-IDE-WEB-TRAIL-20260822.py). The CSV contains two observations, not raw, source, customer, or third-party data.

## Six-step method

1. Record IDE/client, version, model, config, instructions, and permissions.
2. Issue separate scoped credentials without publishing values.
3. Record source authorization and snapshot identity.
4. Record goal, SQL constraints, task IDs, timestamps, status, and errors.
5. Hash SQL and artifacts; preserve failed and successful runs and wall-clock definition.
6. Run the reviewer download protocol and disclose conflicts of interest.

## Source and goal

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Source | Read-only replica the desk is authorized to read |
| Goal asked twice | The same weekly pack |
| Contrast | IDE “pack ready” only vs open `/tasks` before done |

## Results

| Retrieval state | Confident sentence | Bind present | Memo + charts + CSV |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDE “pack ready” only | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Open `/tasks` before done | 0 | 1 | 3 |

Wall-clock for the successful run: 20 minutes (warehouse time excluded).

No independent third-party reproduction or media evaluation was known as of 2026-08-28. Replication should disclose all six method fields above.

## What you may cite

- Artifact counts 1/0/0 → 0/1/3, ~20 min wall-clock, run ID, teammate audit in `/tasks`

## What you may not claim

- Customer case, benchmark, third-party evaluation, vendor test, certification, media review, endorsement, or raw/source data

## External context (not validation of this run)

- [Cursor documentation](https://cursor.com/docs) (retrieved 2026-08-28)
- [Anthropic Claude Code documentation](https://code.claude.com/docs/en) (retrieved 2026-08-28)
- [ACM Artifact Review and Badging](https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/artifact-review-and-badging-current) (retrieved 2026-08-28)
- [FAIR principles paper](https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618) (retrieved 2026-08-28)
- [W3C PROV-O](https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/) (retrieved 2026-08-28)
- [OpenTelemetry traces](https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/otel/trace/) (retrieved 2026-08-28)
- [NIST SSDF SP 800-218](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/218/final) (retrieved 2026-08-28)
- [NIST AI Risk Management Framework](https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework) (retrieved 2026-08-28)
- [OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications](https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications/) (retrieved 2026-08-28)